INSIGHT 5768 - #39 DESIRES
The second paragraph of the Shema
Yisrael1 presents a most interesting
dilemma. The basic theme of the paragraph is that if we
follow the Will of God, we will be blessed with plenty
in crops, in animals, in material sustenance. If
we do not, chas vshalom, we will, in turn,
face the wrath of God which could result in our
banishment from our land, our good land which is blessed,
again, with the ability to provide us with much physical
wealth and sustenance. This is a theme that seems to be
repeated throughout the Torah text, yet on a certain
level it would also seem to be a theme that challenges
our very understanding of the purpose of Torah. Is
prosperity actually to be our goal in observing Torah? It
seems from these and similar verses, wealth
attainable when we observe mitzvot, lost when we
do not is the motivation by which the Torah
directs our behaviour. But is wealth even to be,
according to Torah thought, one of our desires?
Avot 4:1 presents the famous concept that the rich
person is actually not the one who has accumulated much
material wealth but rather the person who is happy with
his/her share, seemingly with what he/she has. This mishna
would seem to reinforce the idea that wealth is not to be
one of our motivations. Avot 6:4 would seem to
further be expressing this point, declaring almost that
asceticism is actually the way that someone grows in
Torah wisdom and reaches the pinnacles of our faith. It
would seem, according to this mishna, that not
only is wealth not to be our goal and depravation not to
be something that we should try to avoid, but our goal
should be exactly the opposite. In this light, the words
of the second paragraph of Shema actually seem
most strange for why would observance of Torah lead to
much material sustenance when such a situation only, it
would seem according to this mishna, leads away
from Torah growth. Why should wealth be our motivation?
It would seem better to be deprived for that is the way,
it seems according to this mishna, that we grow in
Torah and isnt that to be our goal?
Both of these mishnayot actually are further
connected for they both apply the same verse, Tehillim
128:2, as a proof of their assertions. The strange,
thing, though, is that this verse does not really deal
with wealth, in a generic sense, but rather with the
value of labour. Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch, in
his comments on this verse, declares that the verse is
describing the value of wealth that is achieved through
effort, in comparison to wealth that is simply inherited
and which a person simply attains without work. The
question can thus be asked: how did the authors of these
two mishnayot develop a concept that seems to
challenge wealth in general from a verse that only
challenges wealth that is not earned and, in fact,
specifically praises wealth that is the product of
labour? It may be that the fault actually lies in our
understanding of these two mishnayot and that they
also are not challenging wealth in general but only
wealth attained without effort; and, in deed, the way of
Torah is actually not achieved through depravation but
rather in the context of a wealth that is tied to effort.
This, though, does not seem to be the meaning of the
simple reading of these two mishnayot, yet the
simple reading seems to yield its own problems.
Medrash Shmuel, Avot 6:4, in explaining the
concept that the path by which one is to achieve Torah
scholarship is through a measure of depravation, states
that this direction is meant for both the wealthy and the
poor. This is in contrast to the words of Rashi on
this mishna which states that the mishna is
not informing a rich person that he must deprive himself
to achieve success on the path of Torah. Rather the mishna
is informing us that the one who truly wishes to be
successful in the realm of Torah must even be willing to
sacrifice in the basic comforts of life in order to
achieve his objective. Interestingly, Rashi then
concludes with the statement that one who makes such a
sacrifice will be blessed with eventually studying in
wealth.2 The rift between these two
commentators may actually not be so large. There are two
sides to the relationship between wealth and the person.
One is from the material perspective and focuses on the
ability to live in luxury and prosperity. The other
focuses on the individual perspective and the desire
itself to live in luxury and prosperity. The Medrash
Shmuel is focusing on the latter and stating that the mishna
is informing us that, even if we have the ability to live
in a prosperous manner, the path of Torah is not to live
in such a manner. Rashi, though, is focusing on the
former; even if we are limited in our ability to live in
comfort, in order to achieve success in Torah we must be
able to place our desire for Torah over all other desires
and suffer the non-satisfaction of other drives to
satisfy our drive for Torah. Rashi thus concludes with
the blessing that, eventually, in the pursuit of Torah,
we will no longer have to feel the pain and bother of
limitation. No doubt, Medrash Shmuel would agree. Wealth
removes the limitations of depravation but still, having
prosperity does not mean that we should meet all our
desires.
The words of Rav Moshe Chayim Luzzatto, Mesillat
Yesharim, BBei The words of Vhaya im shamoah are thus most important. If we follow Gods Will. He will bless us with the wealth that we need, that allows us the ability to meet our true necessities and thereby allows us to grow in Torah. We though still will have the responsibility to use this ability wisely and not simply satisfy all our theoretical desires because we are able to. We still have the responsibility to work on ourselves and recognize what our true needs really are. We then can thank Hashem for the wealth and therefore the ability to meet these true needs; thereby growing in Torah through the correct prioritization of our efforts and our being. . . 4. Rabbi Benjamin Hecht e-mail Footnotes 1 Devarim 11:13-21. 2 See, similarly, Baruch
Sheamar, Avot 6:4. (c) Nishma, 2008
Return to top |
© 2006 NISHMA