INSIGHT THE WISDOM OF THE ZAKEN
On the
surface, it would seem somewhat appropriate that the story of the search for a
wife for Yitzchak Avinu should begin
with the simple statement that Avraham was old, zaken ba beyamim.1 This is a point of
transition in regard to our forefathers as the narrative of the Torah
essentially switches from the story of Avraham to the story of Yitzchak – and,
as such, we are being told that Avraham is in his later years and indeed this
is a time for transition. Maharsha, Yoma
28b, d.h. She’ne’mar, however, notes that we have already been told that
Avraham is elderly, so why the need to inform us of this again? It is precisely
for this reason, Maharsha maintains, that this gemara explains that what this verse is actually telling us is not
essentially that Avraham was old but, rather, that he was a zaken in the context of being a Torah
scholar, that he never absented himself from the world of Torah study and
scholarship. This is the other meaning of the word zaken2 and the meaning of this
word in this verse. The question arises, though – as distinct from informing us
that Avraham was old – why was it necessary to inform us of Avraham’s Torah
scholarship at this juncture, in the prelude to the transition to Yitzchak? In approaching this question, it may
first be of interest to look at this word zaken
with its meaning as both an elderly person and a Torah scholar. How are these
two concepts interconnected? Torah
Temima, Bereishit 24:3, note 1 explains that there would appear to be an
inherent connection between age and wisdom as, it would seem, the greater the
experiences of life, the greater the learning potential and thus the chance to
acquire wisdom. While this correlation is far from absolute – as there are
younger individuals who are incredibly wise and, sadly, older people who are
essentially still foolish – this definition would seem to have some merit and
so it is appropriate for the term zaken
to hold both meanings. The problem, however, is that the term zaken is not understood to be a
reference to one who is simply wise but, specifically, it refers to one who has
Torah wisdom. How does this connect with Torah Temima’s explanation of the term
zaken which seems to focus on the
wisdom one attains from life experiences? While there is no doubt that the
accumulation of Torah wisdom is also the product of time – the more we study,
the more Torah we can acquire – and thus would be a product of age, it would
seem still not to be the result of life experiences. It is general, secular
wisdom that would seem to be more of a product of what we experience, of our
daily activities and observations. The term zaken
however refers specifically to Torah scholarship. What is, therefore, the
connection between life experiences and Torah wisdom? Torah Temima continues in his
comments by making a reference to the fact that what Avraham Avinu actually did with his teachings
was challenge the great mistake initiated in the generation of Enosh that led
to the advancement of idolatry. Rambam,
Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Avodat Kochavim 1:1 explains that the practice of
idolatry developed in the world because human beings, believing that God
appointed the celestial bodies to govern the world,3
thought it appropriate, and the wish of God, for humans to honour these Divine
appointees. Eventually this led to complete idolatry. Avraham’s wisdom in that
he understood the essential truth of the Oneness of God challenged this perspective
and so he stood for this real truth and fought this false perception of
idolatry. It is for this reason that Avraham is referred to as a zaken and so it is with all who came
after Avraham who were distinguished with this term. Such an explanation of the
word zaken, though, means that it is
much more than a description of one’s knowledge of Torah. The term describes a
perspective, also, on life itself. It marks how someone looks at the world and,
even more so, gains knowledge of the world. Indeed zaken could include a reference to an acquisition of knowledge from
life’s experiences – but within a specific perspective. A zaken may be someone who has learned wisdom from life but solely if
this education was done from the perspective of Torah, from a perspective of
recognition of the One God. People often lose sight of a simple
fact that our conclusions are dependent upon our starting information.
Effective wisdom is thus not just dependent on the process of intelligence but
the initial assumptions and data. Throughout history, many individuals have
been referred to as wise albeit that we now know that the ideas they upheld
were not just false but ludicrous. We apologize for this weakness in these wise
individuals because we recognize that so much was dependent on their starting
points. This is what is distinct about a zaken.
His starting point is Torah which has its source in what is revealed to us. The
process of knowledge is still intact and life is still studied but this
starting point qualitatively defines a different type of wisdom in that there
is a Divinely presented starting point. The zaken
is thus one who has truly acquired chochma,
wisdom, for his method of viewing the world has more validity.4 We now can perhaps understand the
significance of this reference to Avraham as a zaken at this point of transition to the narrative about Yitzchak.
In declaring Avraham a zaken, the
Torah is informing us of his essential purpose, of his role in life and history
of establishing the process of true chochma
within this world. This is the legacy he now leaves to Yitzchak5 and
then to all his descendants. It is not just in our private studies that we
advance the knowledge of Torah in the world. It is through our application of
the Torah worldview in our life experiences and in the knowledge we gain
through these experiences that we advance this worldview. Torah offers us a
unique perspective on the world and we are to apply this perspective to gain
more understanding of this world, this creation of God. From one zaken to the next, starting with Avraham
and the transition to Yitzchak, we are to further this acquisition of true chochma. Rabbi Benjamin Hecht Footnotes 1 Bereishit 24:1. 2 See T.B. Kiddushin 32b 3 While Rambam himself did
not believe in astrology, it is easy to see how a person who accepted a concept
of astrology could make this mistake that the celestial bodies had some type of
authority. In any event, even without considering astrology, seeing how tides
are affected by the moon could have also have led to such a conclusion. 4 Bryan Magee in his work
“Confessions of a Philosopher” makes a statement to the effect that all human
knowledge is still essentially human, i.e. inventions of the human intellect.
It was clearly shown through Einstein’s advancements on Newton’s theories that
all human beings can attest to is their explanation of what is happening but
they can never state the real, inherent truth. Essentially, one could say that
without some revealed information, the acquisition of true chochma is not possible. If a zaken
is one who has, though, acquired chochma,
there must be an element of Revelation in his process. 5 It is interesting to note
that the reference to zaken in regard
to Eliezer in Bereishit 24:2 is also
understood by the gemara to be a
reference to Torah scholarship. © Nishma 2012 Return to top |
© 2010 NISHMA